May 7, 2026
image (33)

The Arunachal Christian Forum (ACF) has voiced strong opposition to the recent recommendations made by the High-Power Committee (HPC) regarding the implementation of the Arunachal Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act (APFRA), 1978. In a formal representation submitted to HPC Chairman Justice Brojendra Prasad Katakey, the forum expressed deep apprehension over the move to frame rules for the decades-old Act, which they argue is fundamentally flawed.

Tarh Miri, the ACF Chief Adviser and a member of the HPC, stated that his core objections were disregarded during the committee’s proceedings. Miri emphasized that since the first meeting, he has consistently advocated for the total repeal of the Act rather than its enforcement. According to the forum, the APFRA is constitutionally questionable and risks becoming a socially divisive tool in a state known for its communal harmony.

The ACF argues that implementing the Act would disrupt the longstanding peace and mutual respect shared between the diverse communities of Arunachal Pradesh. Miri warned that any attempt to legally regulate personal matters of belief and conscience would create a climate of mistrust and undermine the spirit of brotherhood that defines the region. The representation describes the Act as a threat to the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Indian Constitution, specifically the freedom of religion and conscience.

Furthermore, the forum highlighted that Arunachal Pradesh has historically been a beacon of peaceful coexistence. They believe that enforcing these regulations now could lead to avoidable social unrest and instability. The ACF has urged the High-Power Committee to reconsider its stance in the interest of state-wide unity and stability.

The HPC is expected to submit its final report, along with the draft “Arunachal Pradesh Freedom of Religion Rules, 2026,” to the state government within the first half of May. As the deadline approaches, the ACF remains steadfast in its demand that the government prioritize social harmony by repealing the 1978 Act entirely rather than moving forward with its implementation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *